When radiographing steel with a thickness of less than one inch, which x-ray source provides greater radiographic sensitivity?

Prepare for the ASNT Radiographic Testing (RT) Level II Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Get ready for success!

The answer is primarily based on the relationship between penetration power and the ability to produce quality radiographs in thicker materials. In the context of radiographing steel that is less than one inch thick, using a higher kV x-ray machine, such as a 250 kV source, enhances the capability to penetrate the material effectively.

Higher kV settings allow the x-rays to have greater energy, which results in deeper penetration through the steel. This is particularly important when looking for subtle defects that might not be detected with lower energy sources, as higher energy radiation produces less scatter and better contrast in the image quality. The increased energy can also reduce the overall thickness of the steel required to achieve an adequate quality radiograph, which further enhances sensitivity to smaller flaws.

In comparison, lower kV sources like 100 kV or 75 kV may not penetrate as effectively, leading to potential difficulties in visualizing fine details. Meanwhile, while cobalt-60 can provide a reliable alternative source, it has a lower energy output compared to the high kV x-ray machines, which limits its effectiveness in this application. Therefore, the 250 kV x-ray machine is the most suitable choice for achieving greater radiographic sensitivity when dealing with steel of less than

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy